
Money Is Just Crystallized Influence — and Influence Is Just Clarity of Vision
Money is downstream of vision-clarity. Chasing money directly is like chasing fame — it's the symptom, not the cause. Here's the chain in plain terms.
Money is not paper. Money is frozen "yes".
Every euro you hold is a yes that someone, somewhere, said. They handed you their attention, their hour, their agreement, and the bank gave you a token to remember it by. The token is portable. The yes is what's actually inside.
I keep thinking about this because I run a portfolio of projects — a dance platform, a TV channel, a science evening, a coaching site, a few others. Some pull money in. Some don't. The ones that pull money in are not the ones with the cleverest tech or the prettiest landing page. They are the ones where I can say what I'm doing in one breath and a stranger can tell me back what I just said.
That's the whole game. That's it.
If I cannot explain what a project is in a sentence, nobody can repeat it for me. If nobody can repeat it for me, no one tells their friend. If no one tells their friend, the project sits in a tab somewhere and starves. No amount of ads fixes a project that can't be repeated.
So here's the chain as I see it: vision-clarity → simple words → trust → people delegate decisions to you → that delegation is what we call influence → and money is just the part of influence that fits in a wallet.
Let me walk it backwards because that's the order people usually ask about it.
Money. When someone gives you money they are giving you the right to act on their behalf. They are saying: spend this on what you said you'd spend it on. A festival ticket is the buyer telling me, "Go book the venue, hire the DJ, do the thing — I trust the room you'll build." A donation to an open-source project is the same shape: do the thing, I won't audit it. Money is delegated authority with a price tag.
Influence. That's the same delegation, before it crystallizes into a transaction. A friend asks where to dance on Saturday and listens to your answer — you have influence over their evening. A founder asks what stack to pick and goes with your suggestion — you have influence over their next year. Influence is the size of the "yes" you can ask for and get. Money is one specific shape of yes.
Trust. People delegate to you when they trust both your competence (you'll do what you said) and your values (what you'll do is something they'd do themselves). One without the other doesn't compound. A skilled manipulator gets a sale and loses the relationship. A kind person without follow-through gets sympathy and no second meeting. Both have to be there. Trust is the boring word for "I can outsource a decision to this person and not look over their shoulder."
Clarity of vision. Trust grows fastest where the picture is sharp. If I tell you "I want to make Munich the dance capital of Europe" and you can see the city in your head — the parks at sunset, the salsa nights, the festival in the Olympic Park — you can decide in two seconds whether you want to be in that picture. If instead I say "we're a community-focused multi-sided platform leveraging network effects in the social movement vertical", you have to decode for thirty seconds before you can even begin to feel anything. By the time you've decoded, ten other things have grabbed your attention and the moment is gone.
Sharpness is the rate-limiter on everything downstream.
Now look at what this implies, because it's the part that took me a while to swallow. Chasing money directly is chasing the wrong end of the chain. It's like trying to make yourself famous by demanding attention — you can briefly, and people will pull away. The same with money: you can extract a quick transaction by being clever about a checkout flow, and the next quarter you'll be doing it again from zero, because nothing accumulated. Nobody's running around telling their friend about the clever checkout.
Whereas if you build clarity, articulate it simply, and demonstrate over years that you do what you say — the asks get bigger on their own. First someone gives you twenty minutes. Then they give you twenty euros. Then they give you a thousand and tell you to figure it out, because they trust the room you'll build with it. The size of the yes scales with the sharpness of the picture and the consistency of your follow-through. You don't have to push.
The honest test for whether your vision is sharp enough is brutally cheap. Tell it to a stranger, in one sentence, with no jargon. Then stop talking. Watch their face.
Three things can happen.
One: their eyes light up and they ask a question. The picture landed. They're inside it now. You're done.
Two: they nod politely and change the subject. The picture didn't land. They couldn't see it, so they couldn't get curious about it. The fault is yours, not theirs — go simplify.
Three: they repeat your sentence back at you, in their own words, and it's better than what you said. Save those words. Use those words tomorrow. They just did your copywriting for free.
I do this constantly with people I just met. Strangers on a train, the person next to me at a bar, somebody's cousin at a dinner. Not as a sales move — as a calibration tool. The blank politeness in scenario two is the most useful feedback I get all month, because it's the version everyone is too kind to give me when they know me.
So when I'm tempted to spend a week tweaking pricing, or running ads, or designing a new logo to "unlock growth" — I try to catch myself and ask the smaller, harder question. Can a stranger repeat what I do, in their own words, after one sentence? If no, no amount of pricing-tweaking is going to save it. If yes, the pricing will probably take care of itself.
Money is just the receipt. The thing that prints the receipt is a clear sentence and the patience to keep being the person who said it.
Join the discussion on Telegram!
Alösha
Building community platforms, teaching salsa, writing to find my people.